http://coldfusionnow.org/2013-history-of-cold-fusion-calendar/
Maybe I can abscond the info I want for a Wikipedia update when I get my calendar.
Thanks Greg Goble for putting me on to this.
http://coldfusionnow.org/2013-history-of-cold-fusion-calendar/
Maybe I can abscond the info I want for a Wikipedia update when I get my calendar.
Thanks Greg Goble for putting me on to this.
December 5, 2012 at 4:43 am |
wikipedia is useless
December 5, 2012 at 4:45 am |
wiki cold fusion pathological shit
December 5, 2012 at 4:45 am |
Science
December 5, 2012 at 4:47 am
thanks
December 5, 2012 at 4:48 am |
As understanding evolves…
December 5, 2012 at 4:54 am |
http://coldfusionnow.org/publication-of-a-further-3rd-international-patent-application-by-francisco-piantelli-part-i/
December 5, 2012 at 9:04 am |
Wikipedia is just fine for established things, like the population of Lodi, California. For anything new or edgy or revolutionary, most of the time Wikipedia is shit.
If, with a new thing, you get to Wikipedia before the opposition, and everything has an opposition, and you write a really good presentation, you win and the opposition eats shit. (I almost fell on the floor laughing when I wrote that previous sentence.)
December 6, 2012 at 12:46 pm |
Wikipedia is good for well established facts. For breakthroughs in any field the Wikipedia editors chase their tails until everyone is exhausted. Then five years later someone writes an article on the same “breakthrough” and it is accepted as fact, similar to the quote, “Science advances one funeral at a time.”